fbpx

Pegasus Garden CityHome

Bukit Tengah/ 4 November 2014 26 comments

After the successful sales of Pegasus Residence, Pegasus Homes Sdn. Bhd. is launching phase two of their residential development, known as Pegasus Garden CityHone. This development is adjacent to Taman Kerjasama in Bukit Tengah, Penang.

This is a gated and guarded development, comprising 88 unit of 3-storey 1+1 townhouse.  Upper unit type has a built-up area of 1,650 sq.ft. whereas the lower unit type has a built-up area of 1,500 sq.ft. Both types come with two car parking space.

Property Project : Pegasus Garden CityHome
Location : Bukit Tengah, Penang
Property Type : 3-Storey Town House
Tenure : Freehold
Built-up Area: 1,500 sq.ft. (lower type), 1,650 sq.ft. (upper type)
Total Units : 88
Developer : Pegasus Homes Sdn. Bhd.

Tags:

Will housing prices ever come down?

by Ken Lim

Recently I met up with a friend who is a retiree, owning a semi-detached home in the vibrant neighbourhood of Island Glades. His house could easily fetched more than two million ringgit in today’s secondary market. His daughter now is contemplating to purchase a new property while harbouring plans to get married within two to three years.

He decided to seek my view on what are the possible steps the government could undertake to exert a certain degree of control on the property price. My message to him is very simple – If all house owners would find time to collaborate and reach the consensus to sell their house at the same price as the initial purchased price then the property price will remain stagnant. Therefore I initiate an offer to purchase his semi-detached abode at the original developer’s price with the understanding that one of the units of my condominium at Tanjung Tokong will be released to her daughter based on the original transacted price.

Understandably, he has rejected my offer without even blinking his eyes. :)

So, let us take a moment to ponder.

Would you like to even contemplate about the possibility of housing prices dropping?

If you are a first time buyer and you have purchase your condominium at four hundred thousand ringgit, would you be exhilarated if the next phase is selling at a much lower price with respect to the unit you purchased two years earlier?

In 2005, a 1,300sq.ft. unit at Bayswater Resort Condominium would easily fetch a price of three hundred and twenty thousand ringgit only. If it is still selling at that price currently, I’m very certain that everyone will be extremely excited and would not hesitate to grab one now.

However there are two possibilities for the price to stay at three hundred and twenty thousand ringgit after nine years:

  1. Growth has stagnated in Penang and everything remains at status quo. Property price is unchanged at every nook and corner of Penang. However property developer continues to build condominium and still sells it to the public at the same price.
  2. The condo is so bad in terms of its design and construction that no one would be keen enough to purchase with the purpose of staying . That’s why its price does not appreciate at all.

So, would you be excited with the three hundred and twenty thousand price tag?

It is plausible to conclude that everyone who owns a property, be it for own stay or investment, will be very excited and exhilarated to find their property value gain a measurable appreciation.

The reality is such that whenever we wish to purchase a property we would have hoped that the price at the time of purchase would be so far below prevailing market price yet when we have a property of our own, we would harbour the hope that the price of the property will hit the roof.

This article is not meant to lend credence to the act of speculation however the most likely scenario is that property prices will continue to be on an upward trend.

– Ken Lim
(Founder and Principal Reviewer, PenangPropertyTalk.com)

Tags:

Penang may freeze new development projects

Property News/ 1 November 2014 9 comments

The flood situation in Bayan Baru on Wednesday after it rained for almost two hours. File pic: NST Online

The Penang government is considering a freeze of new development projects in Sungai Relau and Sungai Ara area until a detailed study on storm water management is carried out.

This comes on the heels of flash floods hitting many parts of Bayan Baru and Relau here on Wednesday, the worst in recent years, making many roads impassable to light vehicles.

State Local Government, Traffic Management and Flood Mitigation Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow said the developer of a river diversion project had been ordered to take immediate measures to desilt Sungai Relau.

“The Drainage and Irrigation Department, the Public Works Department and the Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) have ordered the developer to desilt the river.

“We have completed the site visit. We are thinking of freezing new applications for development projects in the area until a detailed study on the drainage system and water storm management is laid out.

“Apart from that, the developer will also be getting Telekom Malaysia Bhd to complete their cable works on the new bridge at Jalan Dato Ismail Hashim. Once completed, I hope flash floods will not occur,” he said, adding that the bridge is expected to reduce traffic congestion in Bayan Baru and Relau.

The flash floods, caused by a downpour which started at 11am, some low-lying areas were knee-deep in water, resulting in many stalled vehicles.

The floods also caused a massive traffic snarl in the Bayan Baru township, home to one of the most densely-populated areas on the island.

Other areas such as Sungai Ara and Paya Terubong were not spared as well.

Meanwhile, Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) said the drainage system in these areas should be looked into to prevent flash floods in the future.

Its president S.M. Mohamed Idris urged the state government to stop high rise developments on the island, which was also believed to have aggravated the flash floods.

“Enough damage is done in the island. I do not think the island can cope with more developments.

“Those times Relau and Bayan Baru area had very poor drainage system and for some time it was under control.

“Once developments take place, it causes flash floods similar to the challenges faced by Penangites back in the 90s,” he said when contacted.

Source: New Straits Times Online

Tags:

Seminar raises more questions about the state of property sector

Property News/ 1 November 2014 2 comments

Two common questions on the local property market… Will house prices ever come down? Is it better to buy now before GST?

While speakers at the 24th National Real Estate Convention, comprising an economist and a few property consultants, try to provide some form of answers, new questions have cropped up, due to interest in the residential sub-segment of the property sector.

Housing transactions comprised a big chunk of total property transactions in terms of both volume and value between 2008 and 2013, with prices taking an upward path at the end of 2009.

During this five-year period, residential sub-segment formed an average of 48% and 63% of total value and volume of the total property market. This has led to house mortgages taking up a major part of the total lending. Hence, the increase in household debt.

Yeah Kim Leng, the dean of the School of Business at Malaysia University of Science and Technology says the property market is “shaped by so many forces” and must be view against the national and internationl global economy.

While Malaysia has been enjoying five years of growth of between 5% and 6%, the country has to focus on the long-term prospect against the ever-changing national and international backdrop.

He says Malaysia’s issues with regards the property sector are not unique – other countries are also dealing with their respective challenges in the property sector.

“The current global economic conditions are important to the Malaysian economy, which, like other countries, has been impacted by ‘cheap money’ and low cost of financing,” he says.

He says just as growth is uneven in different countries, so are the property markets in the developed and developing countries. Prices are rising in UK and Australia, stable in Germany, easing off in the US and falling at a slower pace in Spain and Greece. In China, prices are falling while Singapore property prices are in a state of flux, rising and falling.

The question today is: How long does it take for property markets (in the world) to recover)?

On the home front, Yeah says, the local property prices are not sustainable. Prices are rising faster than income.

“We are over-leveraged and any increase in debt should be in relation with our income level,” he says. Financial institutions’ exposure to the property and construction industry in 2013 were massive.

Loans-to-deposit ratio hovered at 80% at the end of 2013, with almost 45% going into propety sector, says Yeah. Banks are flush with cash, but our household debt is no longer sustainable (for us to borrow anymore). Our property loans suggest that we have reached a stage where we need to rebalance credit growth, says Yeah.

“Property prices are also no longer sustainable. The questions to ask are: How fast are property prices cooling? How sustainable are price increases?

“The challenges for next year are how will we adjust to the new price environment, with the imposition of GST and the continuing subsidy rationalisation?”

The conclusion is that there may be some form of soft landing in the property sector.

Despite this rather sombre introduction, Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association Malaysia (Rehda) president Datuk Seri Fateh Iskandar Mohamed Mansor is adamant that prices will not come down because land prices and cost of construction are not coming down.

Fateh Iskandar says there are five components that make up the cost and price of a house, namely:

> land cost/price;

> construction cost;

> compliances;

> capital contribution charges; and

> financing and profit margin.

“All five are subject to cost pressures and are on an upward trajectory,” Fateh Iskandar, who heads the Glomac group says.

The daily wages of construction workers have risen by 81%-200% between 2007 and 2013. Building materials like cement, steel bars and bricks have gone up 15%-50% between 2009 and 2013, he says.

Corporatised utility companies like Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB), the water concessionaires, Indah Water, Telekom and the Construction Industry Development Board are frontloadiing capital expenditure to consumers by imposing it on private developers, who then pass the costs to house buyers, says Fateh Iskandar.

Compliance costs relate to local authorities’ planning requirements which involves issues like density vs plot ratio, development charges and other planning specifications. These are also passed on to buyers.

“Construction cost makes up 46%. If a developer’s background is agriculture, his land cost may be as little as 10% but for others, this may be 20%. Lenders are imposing stricter requirements when it comes to end-financing and bridging finance issues,” he says.

Since last year, and increasingly this year, the inability to get a mortgage loan has resulted in many walking away from a purchase.

“People want to buy but they are unable to get a loan,” says Fateh Iskandar.

About 80% of households earn less than RM6,900 monthly, and of this, 40% earn less than RM2,000, which explains why many are forced to walk way from a purchase, he says.

Assuming a RM500,000 loan for 30 years, with a 10% downpayment and 90% financing (base lending rate of 6.85% less 2.40%), the monthly repayment is about RM2,519, says Fateh Iskandar.

He says the loan rejection rate is 35%, 30% and 26% in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Penang the last two years compared to 20%, 20% and 13% respectively.

Foo Gee Jen, managing director of CH Williams Talhar and Wong Sdn Bhd offers no silver lining. He sums up the state of the housing situation in the Klang Valley with several observations.

Among the most obvious is that speculative activities of the last several years have resulted in high sales but this is accompanied with rising vacancies (see table).

Foo says investors and speculators are buying, or have bought, residential properties that genuine homemakers do not want (because they are either poorly located or are too small.) Foo draws attention to the small office, home office market and its variances.

Other concerns include the high house prices in non-prime locations. New launches in Semenyih and Rawang now cost almost 65% to 75% of those in Petaling Jaya and Bandar Utama, he says.

In Iskandar Malaysia, Johor, Chinese developers have flooded the high-rise market. Development trend has switched from high-rise to landed.

The key trend in Klang Valley’s housing market today has more developments near infrastructure projects, rail and highways.

Does the above observations help to enhance value?

Source: StarProperty.my

Tags:

How safe are G&G communities?

Property News/ 1 November 2014 3 comments

The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear’. – H.P. Lovecraft

MUCH has been written recently on the mushrooming of gated and guarded (G&G) developments in Malaysia. Many of these developments have been the result of the steadily deteriorating state of security in our communities with regular reports of break-ins, kidnappings, rape and other acts of violence being highlighted daily in the newspapers and media. Our fear of this is nothing new except that the scale of it has magnified in the last 10 years.

When I look back, the first thing we did when we bought a house in the 1970s was to have it fitted with grills – for the doors, windows and any aperture that could give access to a criminal. We are used to living in virtual prisons, but these grills gave residents a sense of security.

Communities started to expand with the influx of foreign workers, both legal and illegal. Inevitably, these barriers presented no problems to a new wave of criminals who displayed much innovation in their approach to gain illegal access and entering homes. Crime had arrived big time on our doorsteps, and we were fearful.

These security concerns gave rise to the first of the G&G communities; some of the earliest examples which were Country Heights in Kajang, Tropicana in Petaling Jaya, the Mines in Seri Kembangan and Kelab Golf Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah in Kuala Lumpur. These early developments included golf courses, club houses and other amenities.

Condominium developments featured the G&G concept and became popular because they offered the same level of security. The popularity of the developments in Mont Kiara, Bangsar and Ampang in Kuala Lumpur is self-evident as they were well taken up by the expatriate community and wealthy members of our community. Developers seeing this as an excellent way of positioning their products for premium pricing started launching G&G housing and condominium projects on a larger scale.

These G&G developments come with perimeter fencing, a single ingress and egress point at the security guardhouse, 24/7 patrol guards, CCTV (close circuit television) systems (some even offering motion detectors) and a smart home relay system to the guardhouse to monitor visitors and to provide security feedback.

Within homes, there could be a Smart Home system installed, apart from the regular home alarm. There is another point in the Smart Home relay system that is linked to the guardhouse, which allows security feedback and monitoring of movement within the G&G community.

And, they were expensive to buy and live in. Estimates show that a G&G home can fetch as much as a 60% premium over regular homes. However, these are landed strata developments and as a result, all the amenities are owned by the residents and they have to pay a monthly maintenance fee and sinking fund as well as set up their own Management Corporation to manage the community after the developer hands over the development to the buyers.

Sometimes these fees can amount to as much as RM600 to RM1,000 a month.

Problems arise when some residents don’t pay up (some could be foreign investors who can’t be contacted) and so the residents living there have to pay more to maintain the level of service they require. With this price tag comes peace of mind as these G&G developments have a lower crime rate when compared to older developments that don’t have it.

Well, that takes care of the rich and famous but what about the rest of us Malaysians?

G&G developments account for a fraction of the 6.4 million households in Malaysia and many have to live with the daily fear I have described. Some communities have taken things into their own hands and this has resulted in makeshift arrangements like the pooling of resources to have a guard at the end of the road to register visitors who are coming in and leaving, or paying a company which promises to do patrolling services in the neighbourhood.

These services can cost as much as RM40 to RM200 a month with varying results.

It is not possible for the entire population of Malaysia to live in walled communities. What we need to do is tackle the problem at the source. In short, we need more “boots” on the ground from our police force, more patrol cars, increased lockups and more community police stations. However, the Government does not seem to have the budget to do this – but the local councils do.

If households can afford to spend up to RM40 a month for an old guy on a motorbike to patrol their neighbourhood, shouldn’t we instead, pay that amount to the local authority to improve the security in our towns and cities?

The provision of our security has always been the job of the Government of the day, and they are mandated to provide and pay for the personnel as well as the infrastructure (patrol cars, offices, police stations and accommodation).

What if it was the responsibility of each town or city to pay for the infrastructure and the Government only pays for the cost of the personnel? I honestly think that this could work.

Two things will happen. Each town will have a better paid and fully equipped police force with state-of-the-art facilities and the Government will be able to dispatch more police to control crimes.

Local authorities will have to ask resident owners to pay a “Security Assessment Levy”, which will be added to their current assessment payments that could be passed on to tenants (if the property is rented). I know that there will be howls of protest but aren’t these same people willing to pay anywhere from RM500 to RM12,000 a year for a sense of security?

A friend of mine who lives in a G&G community shared with me that his friends have stopped coming around because of the hassle of visiting him and he feels isolated from the suburb he lives in. He worries about his kids leaving the house to play with his friends outside his G&G haven and his wife is constantly on the lookout for snatch thieves. Living in a G&G community does not preclude one from potential criminal acts as it can easily happen outside the home.

The answer lies in providing us with better security and a better funded police force. We must start to find a formula that will work in the long run. Locking ourselves in is never a solution as it treats the symptoms but not the disease which, if not checked, could paralyse our society over time.

Source: StarProperty.my

Tags: