fbpx

3 Storey Semi-D @ Ratu Mutiara

Ratu Mutiara, a seaside resort development by Taman Ratu since 1991 near Batu Ferringhi, Penang.  This latest development comprises 20 units of partially-furnished luxury semi-detached houses with outdoor jacuzzi overlooking private garden.

Located away from the hustle and bustle of the town center while conveniently connected to shopping malls, dinning and recreation amenities by major roads.

Property Project : Ratu Mutiara
Location : Tanjung Bungah, Penang
Property Type : Semi-Detached
Built-up: 4,400 sq.ft. onwards
Land Area: 40ft. x 75ft. onwards
Total Units: 20
Tenure: Freehold
Indicative Price: RM 2,380,000 onwards
Developer: Taman Ratu
Marketing Agent: New Bob Realty Sdn. Bhd.

Location Map:

 

Tags:

New doesn’t mean perfect, vis-à-vis purchase from housing developers

Property News/ 29 June 2013 No comments

House buyers in Malaysia need to be educated about their rights. They have to be made aware of the issues they face, and to demand quality for the huge sum of money they are paying for their property.

Complaint One

“I received the keys to our home and to our dismay, the property had many defects, ranging from minor problems to major misalignment of the walls and beams. The developer is rectifying the minor defects but is not willing to align’ the walls or beams that have been placed improperly. How can I have the process for rectification expedited as we have paid in full and are still unable to occupy the house?”

Complaint Two

“The floor tiles in my apartment’s living room are not properly fixed. When one walks over them, they give a certain hollow sound. There are at least 30 floor tiles with this problem. Also, the edges of the walls where the tiles meet were not properly done. I submitted a complaint form, but the developer has not done anything to rectify them. Now, it’s been almost 12 months, and every time we call to ask about the repair work, they tell us they could not find the right colour tiles. We are told that the only alternative is for us to change all the tiles with the developer only bearing the cost of workmanship!”

OVER the years, the National House Buyers Association (HBA) has recorded thousands of complaints from house buyers who were not satisfied with the condition of their new homes or the way defects were rectified.

The complaints above are just two of them. Construction defects range from complex structural issues, which threaten the integrity of buildings, to simple items relating to aesthetics. After receiving the keys to their houses, the smile on the buyers’ face soon fade when they are caught in a situation of getting the multiple defects in their homes rectified satisfactorily.

The new generation of house buyers expects their homes to be defect-free. The quality of houses, which although has improved over the past decade, has not kept pace with buyers’ expectations in both design and finishes. There is also a lack of industry quality standards that are compatible with public interest and expectations which has resulted in many disputes over the rectification of defects as developers, contractors and house buyers have different expectations.

Defect Liability Clause

The pre-determined “Defect Liability Clause” in the sale and purchase agreement (SPA) states that the developer is required to repair and make good, at its own cost and expenses, any defects, shrinkage or other faults that become apparent within a period of 18 or 24 calendar months (whichever is applicable) after the delivery of vacant possession and which can be attributed to defective workmanship, materials or a failure to construct the property in accordance with the plan and description appended to the SPA within 30 days of having received written notice from the purchaser.

The second part of the clause states that the purchaser shall, at any time after the expiry of the 30-day notice, notify the developer of the cost of repairing and make good of the said defects by giving the developer a grace period of 14 days.

Essentially, the following is what a buyer has to do if he finds defects in his new home:

a) List all defects in writing; take pictures of them, if possible.

b) Make sure the developer receives the defects list either by registered post or by delivery by hand with acknowledgement of receipt.

If the developer is responsive, he will do rectification work 30 days from the date of receipt. The buyer should go through the list of defects with the developer to discuss the rectification work schedule. He must also be prepared to spend time or appoint someone to be around for the appointed contractors to do their work.

If the developer is unresponsive, get a detailed quotation from a reputable independent contractor for the cost of repairing and making good the defects. Give the developer a second notice and the stipulated 14-day grace period to do the rectification work. The buyer may recover the cost (any sum) of the repair from the developer’s stakeholder lawyer after giving written notification to withhold release of the stakeholder sum the 5% of the purchase price as stated in the SPA.

Appoint a building inspector, where necessary

Although the law provides a 18- or 24-month warranty (whichever is applicable) for owners to refer defects to the developers, buyers do not know what to look out for as they don’t have the expertise to suss out or foresee inconspicuous defects.

Many are unaware that getting building inspectors to inspect their homes can save them a lot of heartache at the end of the day. By getting these professionals to conduct defect checks, owners will be able to identify problems early and get them rectified before they escalate. They have the trained eye to identify faults disguised by cosmetic improvements, which may be missed by the laymen. Most architects and surveyors double up as building inspectors in Malaysia.

The inspectors, whose fees range from RM500 to RM3,000, will examine a property and submit a report, which includes recommendations for follow-up action. The awareness of the availability of such a service in the country is still low.

  • Typically, a thorough inspection should pinpoint:
  • Structural cracking or deformities on walls, roofs and floors;
  • Dampness leading to rotting or unsound structure;
  • Damage to timber caused by fungal decay, wood borers, termites or by industrial chemicals;
  • Defective plumbing and drainage systems; and
  • Superficial repair work.

In addition, some building inspector may even estimate the cost of remedying defects found. Most of the time, their reports are submitted to the Tribunal for Home Buyer Claims when an aggrieved buyer makes a claim for monetary compensation and technical claims. Very often, building inspectors are summoned to the tribunal as an expert witness to challenge developer’s rebuttals.

What next?

Besides the legal steps, buyers should band together. Contact neighbours who have similar difficulties in getting defects rectified. You may have more in common than you think. There is power in numbers, and you can share tasks to lighten the load. The main objective is to convince the developer that you are serious in getting the defects rectified properly.

The affected buyers can collectively lodge a complaint with the Enforcement Division of the National Housing Department, Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government Ministry, with the view that it will intervene and subsequently convene a meeting with all the parties concerned. Details of the said Enforcement Division is as follows:

Pengarah
Bahagian Penguatkuasaan
Jabatan Perumahan Negara
Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan
Aras 30, No. 51, Persiaran Perdana
Presint 4, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
62100 Putrajaya
Tel No: 603-8891 4410
Email: enforcement@kpkt.gov.my

Remember that the quality of construction work in your neighbourhood will affect the property’s resale value and possibly your safety. Filing a claim at the Tribunal for Home Buyer Claims

House buyers who are caught in a dispute with their housing developers over non-remedial of defects, shrinkage, defective workmanship or materials or other technical faults are at liberty to file their claims at the Tribunal for Home Buyer Claims (The Housing Tribunal).

The Housing Tribunal was set up as an alternative forum for house buyers to save them the cost and hassle of fighting with housing developers in the civil court. The filing fee is only RM10, no lawyer is required and hearings are normally fixed within a month.

The Housing Tribunal is empowered to hear disputes between house buyers and licensed housing developers but the claims must be filed within the time frames provided under section 16N of the Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (the HDA). Check out the link to the Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government Ministry vis-vis Tribunal at http://www.kpkt.gov.my/kpkt_bi_2013/index.php/pages/view/370

Source: StarProperty.my

Tags:

Bank Negara is studying the risks arising from DIBS with a view of potentially imposing curbs on it

Property News/ 26 June 2013 139 comments

PETALING JAYA: Bank Negara is studying the risks arising from the developer interest-bearing scheme (DIBS) with a view of potentially imposing curbs on it, sources said.

Although it is unclear if or when such curbs would be put in place, Hong Leong Investment Bank (HLIB) said that it may be “later this week”, adding that such a move would be a negative for future sales in the primary property market.

Other industry players think that the measures might be introduced in the second half of the year.

DIBS has become a popular easy financing package offered by property developers in joint-promotion activities with banks in recent years.

Under the scheme, buyers need not fork out much initial downpayment to buy properties, as the developer supposedly absorbs the initial interest. This is until the buyer takes possession of the property.

A high number of buyers enter this scheme with the intention of flipping the property when they gain possession of it, making a profit without having to come up with much capital in the process. Such a scenario fuels speculation.

“Typically, under the scheme, buyers only foot between 5% and 10% of the house price upon signing the sale and purchase (S&P) agreement and only begin payment when the project is completed,” a property consultant told StarBiz.

“There are caveats to this scheme, as buyers commit to a financial obligation upon the signing of the S&P and the interest cost has actually been already passed on to buyers via the higher selling prices.”

DIBS is mainly offered to the high-rise residential segment. Some property consultants have opined that the presence of DIBS in the market has caused prices to be set on an artificially higher trajectory.

Notably, the Singapore government banned DIBS in 2009.

“While the exact measures are yet to be revealed, we believe the curbs would impact this easy financing scheme,” HLIB said in a note yesterday.

According to analysts, most of the sales in the recent property bull cycle were tied to the attractive DIBS scheme at the expense of the secondary property market which has remained sluggish. And given the persistent rise in household debt, the Government is mulling over measures to limit it.

“In the recent past, Bank Negara has been compiling information on the scheme and studying its impact on the sector,” a source said.

Bank Negara had yet to respond to StarBiz’s queries as at press time.

“The difference between the non-DIBS and DIBS pricing can range from as low as 5% to as high as 30% if other incentives like early-bird discounts, stamp duty waivers and cash payments are taken into account,” said Elvin Fernandez, managing director of Khong & Jaafar group of companies.

He advocates regulators to compel developers to be transparent on the various incentives, as it may be difficult to do away with DIBS packages.

“Developers should inform buyers and bankers of the actual value of the discounts they are getting so that house buyers know the true value of the house they are buying,” he said.

UOB Kay Hian Research noted that new launches in selective high-rise projects in the suburbs of the Klang Valley were transacted at over RM1,000 per sq ft (psf) vis-a-vis RM450 psf two years ago.

“Household debt has risen to 80.5% of nominal gross domestic product as at end-December 2012, up from 60.4% as at end-2008.

“We also note that outstanding banking sector loans in the household sector has risen 3.6% year-to-date as at end-April to RM638.5bil from RM616.5bil as at December 2012. As the rise in consumer credit is partly linked to housing, curbs may be introduced to dampen speculation,” UOB Kay Hian said in a report yesterday.

On the financial impact of curbing DIBS on property companies, HLIB said that it would be “negative for future sales in the primary market but the extent of damage varies with the degree of exposure to the high-rise segment for each individual developer”.

UOB Kay Hian reckons that if DIBS or similar schemes were to be tightened, it could “significantly dampen new property launches as speculators will be filtered out”.

The company also does not rule out the possibility of a further upward revision in real properties gains tax (RPGT) to dampen speculation.

In Budget 2013, the Government had raised the RPGT for the second time since 2011, stipulating a 10% to 15% tax for the disposal of properties within two years of purchase, and 5% to 10% for the disposal of properties within three to five years. However, properties sold five years after purchase are exempted from the RPGT.

Source: StarProperty.my

Tags:

Home Loan Redraw Facility Explained

Property News/ 24 June 2013 No comments

In recent times, the redraw facility has become a common feature in most home loan packages in Malaysia.  Whilst the concept of redraw is relatively simple to understand for most seasoned home buyers; a new home buyer may find this term slightly confusing as it really isn’t something you see everyday.

In this article, we explain what redraw facility is and how you would be able to take advantage of it if your home loan has this feature.

What is Redraw?

Redraw is the act of accessing excess payment you have made on your home loan.  To understand this concept, we will first have to explain what excess payment in a home loan is.

In Malaysia, most home loan packages allow you to make excess repayment, which basically means extra payment you pay to the bank on top of the minimum loan repayment amount.

Example:

Say your monthly home loan repayment is RM1,000.

And this month, you’ve made a repayment of RM1,100.

Your excess repayment = RM1,100 – RM1,000 = RM100.

Making these excess repayments is not without its benefit.  For most home loan packages, the excess repayments are used directly to offset the principle loan amount, which in turn reduces the amount of interest you’ll pay over the term of your home loan.

A redraw facility is a feature that allows you to withdraw excess repayments you’ve made on your home loan.  Say you’ve been making extra repayments religiously and have accumulated a total of RM10,000 in excess repayments, a redraw would allow you to take out that RM10,000 as cash for your own use.

Obviously, making a redraw means you’ll lose out on all the interest-saving benefits stemming from making excess repayments; but it is still a very handy feature especially when you need cash in a hurry and wish to reuse the excess repayments you’ve made.

One Thing to Take Note Of When Using Redraw Facility

Whilst the availability of redraw facility undoubtedly makes excess prepayment seems like a good idea for a home loan; one should always remember that executing a redraw usually involves fees and charges.

In Malaysia, most banks charge a standard fee of RM50 for every redrawal from a conventional home loan package.

For anyone carrying a home loan, the existence of redrawal fees is significant as it means you CANNOT treat your home loan like a standard current account (where you can put in and take out money as you like).

So before you make that excess payment, make sure you won’t actually be needing to redraw it a couple of days or weeks down the road… for you could potentially be losing more money than you’ve saved by making redrawals one time too many!

This article comes courtesy of www.imoney.my which compares between the various loans, savings and insurance schemes available in Malaysia.

Tags:

Skyview Piazza

Jelutong/ 21 June 2013 No comments

Skyview Piazza is well placed to attract quality customers from the immediate vicinity. With all its units located on the ground floor, it offers a huge captive market of the residents from its base of Skyview Residence and other surrounding ones too, making it a sure choice for retail business. Designed with carefully planned layouts, Skyview Piazza is, without doubt, dedicated to the lifestyle activities of the entire family, all year around.

Property Name: Skyview Piazza
Location :
 Perak Road, Jelutong, Penang
Property Type : Mixed development
Total Units: 6
Land Tenure : Freehold
Developer : Gema Intan Sdn. Bhd.

Tags: